Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/03/12
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Poor choice of words - how about 'will suck juice more slowly?' And why?
Because the shutter is cocked mechanically by thumb, and isn't cocked
electronically. And there's no electronic viewfinder. Small points,
perhaps, but....:-)
- -----Original Message-----
From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
[mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us] On Behalf Of
grduprey@rockwellcollins.com
Sent: Friday, March 12, 2004 12:17 PM
To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
Subject: RE: [Leica] Steve Gandy's update on the digital bessa
B.D.
How do you figure the Epson is less battery dependant? It is totally
dependant on batteries or it does not function/record images.
Gene
"B. D. Colen"
<bdcolen@earthlink.net> To:
<leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Sent by: cc:
owner-leica-users@mejac.palo Subject: RE:
[Leica] Steve Gandy's update on the digital bessa
-alto.ca.us
03/12/2004 09:08 AM
Please respond to
leica-users
And a red dot...
Frankly - assuming that the image quality of the RD is as good or better
than the D2 - and we DO NOT KNOW that yet - the answer to the question
is very indicative of the seriousness of one's photographic efforts. One
camera allows the use of 'real' Leica glass and of Cosina lenses that
are the equal of all but the latest such glass, allows real rangefinder
viewing, has reduced battery dependence, has a larger CCD, has higher
available iso. The other is a grossly overpriced point and shoot - with
a red dot.
Again, we know NOTHING about the image quality produced by the CosEpson
- - nor do we really know anything about build quality. So any comparisons
at this point are based only on specs.
B. D.
- -----Original Message-----
From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
[mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us] On Behalf Of Dante
Stella
Sent: Friday, March 12, 2004 8:05 AM
To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
Subject: Re: [Leica] Steve Gandy's update on the digital bessa
The D2, because it has an extremely fast zoom lens
On Mar 12, 2004, at 7:19 AM, Peter Dzwig wrote:
> Perhaps most interesting is market positioning. With a D2 costing GBP
> 1300 and an RD-1 costing GBP 1500 (on today's exchange rate and
> assuming USD2700) which would you rather have if you already have M
> lenses.
>
> Peter Dzwig
>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Phong"
>> Subject: RE: [Leica] Steve Gandy's update on the digital bessa
>>> Let me rephrase: $2700 is too much for me. :-)
>>> But don't go yelling at me if I end up buying
>>> it anyway.
>>>
>>> About the framelines, I read it that the camera will
>>> bring up the proper framing for the lens in use; so the Leica M 28mm
>>> Summicron, say, will bring up the 28mm frameline, which is not the
>>> same view as the 28mm frameline on your Leica M. Did I miss
>>> something ?
>>>
>>> I would have preferred CF cards, as that is what I use.
>>> Do 1-Gig SD cards exist and at what price ?
>>>
>>> - Phong
>> --
>> To unsubscribe, see
>> http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, see
> http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
>
>
____________
Dante Stella
http://www.dantestella.com
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html