Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/03/11

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] More is better
From: Doug Herr <telyt@earthlink.net>
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 18:39:10 -0800

on 3/11/04 5:36 PM, BenMarks@aol.com at BenMarks@aol.com wrote:

> For my part, I welcome the efforts of any manufacturer who wants to increase
> the options for me to use this glass I love.  Add to that the nudge to Solms
> that the introduction of a non-Leica digital-M will give and I just can't see
> anything to be pessimistic about.  My hat is off the engineers who solved this
> "impossible" technical challenge about which so many electrons have been
> spilt. Bravissimo! Now let's see the camera.


I also welcome additional choices... but I don't see that they've solved the
impossible technical challenge.  They've avoided the technical challenges by
not using a full-frame sensor.

Doug Herr
Birdman of Sacramento
http://www.wildlightphoto.com


- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

Replies: Reply from dante@umich.edu (Re: [Leica] Retrofocuspocus was: More is better)
Reply from David Degner <david.degner@wku.edu> ([Leica] FS: Collectible Leicas and Zunow 50mm f1.1 LTM)