Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/03/11

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] epson digital RF report pages
From: Sam <sam@osheaven.net>
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 12:29:51 -0500
References: <OF0C1B1593.2B70DD09-ON86256E54.00538F80-86256E54.0054B2C8@crnotes2.rockwellcollins.com>

If it were labeled Leica it would be priced a few thousand dollars more. 
Digital is a new ball game. Why pay thousands more for the same camera 
only rebadged?

Besides, digital is faddish at the moment and not dependent on logic.

Sam S


grduprey@rockwellcollins.com wrote:

>What I find amazing is the 1.53x  lens factor.  None of you out there who
>were just a few weeks ago saying if Leica comes out with a M Digital with
>less than a 1x lens factor it would be Totally unacceptable, are not
>complaining one bit about Epson/Cosina doing it.  Not One Complaint.  The
>only comment so far on this is I can live with it.  Interesting...  If
>Leica had done this very same thing right now, you would be screaming and
>calling for a revolt and overthrow of the company.
>
>Gene
>
>
>  
>
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

Replies: Reply from "Gerry Walden" <gwpics@aol.com> (Re: [Leica] epson digital RF report pages)
In reply to: Message from grduprey@rockwellcollins.com (RE: Re: [Leica] epson digital RF report pages)