Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/02/21

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Pushing Portra 160
From: "animal" <s.jessurun95@chello.nl>
Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2004 12:15:00 +0100
References: <r02010100-1032-B67464B563D311D8A50F000393D465D8@[10.0.1.8]>

yes there is .recently i did the same with a slide film what remainded was
very sharp not that a lot remained.heck maybe you overexposed some who knows
.
maybe if you look at the data sheet of the film there is a  processing
mentioned for underexposed film.i know ilford has this on their spec sheets
simon j

- ----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Adam Bridge" <abridge@mac.com>
To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Sent: Friday, February 20, 2004 7:36 PM
Subject: [Leica] Pushing Portra 160


> I accidently shot a roll of Portra 160 underexposed by, well, how to say
this
> without looking really stupid...nope, there's no way....oh well.... THREE
STOPS.
>
> Is it even worth trying to get images off this film?
>
> Thanks
>
> Adam
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
>

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from Adam Bridge <abridge@mac.com> ([Leica] Pushing Portra 160)