Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/02/03
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
To continue to beat a horse of a different color, this is a long post,
extracted from current research literature, explaining the assertion that there are
more than three types of color receptors in the human eye. The trichromatic
theory of color vision is not invalidated, as such, but it has been
significantly modified. It helps explain why we can see colors that we cannot normally
photograph and why people disagree on the exact color match of pieces of fabric.
(This is my problem when my wife takes me shopping with her.)
A long accepted fundamental property of human vision is trichromacy. The
trichromatic theory helps to explain our color perceptions and color
discriminations. The anatomical basis of trichromacy begins with the complement of cone
photoreceptors in the retina. For over one hundred years researchers thought that
the color-normal eye contained three cone types, designated as S, M, and L,
whose photopigments were later psychophysically estimated to have peak spectral
sensitivities near 440, 540, and 560 nanometers. There is considerable
overlap in sensitivity of the middle wavelength sensitive and long wavelength
sensitive cone types.
Over the years, however, psychologists questioned whether subtle variations
may exist in normal color vision based on small individual differences in the
spectral sensitivities of the photopigments (Alpern & Wake, 1977; Neitz &
Jacobs, 1986). The findings of the early studies were viewed with some skepticism,
however, because of the difficulty in ruling out measurement error and
confounding factors. As the psychophysical evidence grew, researchers began to
investigate this possibility from many angles.
Today, psychophysical (Neitz & Jacobs, 1990; Mollon, 1992),
microspectrophotometric (Dartnall, Bowmaker, & Mollon, 1983), and molecular genetic studies
(Nathans, Piantanida, Eddy, Shows, & Hogness, 1986; Winderickx et al., 1992)
provide evidence of substantial variation in the number and spectral sensitivity
of the cone types in the color-normal eye (also see Mollon, Cavonius, and
Zrenner, 1998). The evidence now suggests the presence of three broad families of
normally occurring cone photopigments. There is thought to be only one
photopigment with a peak spectral sensitivity in the short wavelengths (blue), but
there is now evidence that there are multiple middle wavelength (green)
photopigments and multiple long wavelength (red) photopigments. The difference in
spectral sensitivity among the middle wavelength pigments or among the long
wavelength pigments has been estimated to be approximately 5-7nm(Neitz, Neitz, &
Jacobs, 1995). In fact there may be as many as 9 different cone types with various
peaks in photosensitivity among the middle and long wavelength families.
Molecular genetic analyses show that individuals may inherit a surprisingly
large number of different X-linked, recessive genes that encode the production
of these photopigments (Neitz, Neitz, & Grishok, 1995). An obvious question is
why do we have so many color vision genes? The genes that encode the middle
and long wavelength sensitive pigments reside near the end of one of the arms
of the X chromosome and they have very similar DNA sequences. In fact, the
substitution of one amino acid in the DNA of a photopigment gene is sufficient to
cause a change in the spectral sensitivity of that photopigment and in our
color perceptions. The location and similarity of these genes makes them
susceptible to the kinds of genetic errors that produce multiple gene copies, as well
as hybrid genes that are genetic composites of the original ones (Nathans, et
al., 1986).
At present, it appears that normal color vision results from inheriting at
least one cone type from each cone class (short, middle, and long). It is
unclear, however, which complement of genes and cone types result in specific types
of color vision deficiency. There is a great deal of genetic variation among
individuals with the same type of color defect, making this work difficult.
However, it appears that both the type and severity of a color vision defect can
be linked to the complement of different cone types in the retina. Hybrid
genes, which have been associated with small differences in the spectral
sensitivity of the photopigments, are thought to be involved.
These findings lead to an interesting question: if humans possess more than
three cone types in their retina, do they still have trichromatic vision? The
answer appears to be yes, presumably because the outputs of the different
middle or longwavelength cone photoreceptors are summed together before leaving the
retina. The resulting signals differ to a small but significant degree across
individuals, though, because they affect color perception in some situations.
Individuals with different complements of cone pigments will not accept each
other's color matches in the long wavelength end of the spectrum and they will
disagree on color names for certain wavelengths of light (Neitz, Neitz, &
Jacobs, 1993). For example, a particular mixture of red and green light might
appear a perfect yellow to your eye, but appear a greenish-yellow or slightly
orange to someone else. This type of color vision assessment, called the Rayleigh
Match, is the most accurate method for measuring color discrimination and
diagnosing the congenital color vision defects.
The distribution of photoreceptors in the retina appears to be nearly random.
The ratio of R / G / B cone types varies, but the long wavelength cones are
the most prevalent; short wavelength cones the least prevalent in the retina.
Women who are heterozygous for the normal complement of color vision genes, th
erefore, may have a mosaic retina: a patchwork of color-normal and
color-deficient regions (Cohn, Emmerich, & Carlson, 1989). The nature of this mosaic
depends on the inherited complement of color vision genes and on the point in
development that X-chromosome inactivation occurred. That is, some women
heterozygous for these genes may develop a color vision deficiency while others may
develop normal color vision (Miyahara, Pokorny, Smith, Baron, & Baron, 1998).
And, in fact, there are reports in the literature of identical (monozygotic)
twins where one twin has normal color vision and the second is color-deficient
(Jorgenson, et al., 1992).
In light of these current findings, sensory psychologists and other
perception researchers are designing psychophysical tasks to try to tease apart the
nature of color processing in the eyes of individuals with different complements
of cone photoreceptors. The challenge will then fall to neuroscientists,
molecular biologists, and others to support or refute these findings at the
cellular level.
Future work for sensory psychologists will also involve investigating the
extent to which these individual differences in color vision affect interactions
with the world. Society uses color to code information in a variety of
settings, including art. photography, education and transportation. In many
occupations color discrimination is critical, for example, in discriminating electrical
wiring and colored signal lights or in medical research. While these
individual differences are small, they may prove to be problematic in some settings.
In contrast to the research directed at the earliest stages of sensory
processing, today there is also substantial exciting research interest at the other
end of the S&P continuum: This research is directed at higher level perceptual
processes and phenomena in the gray area where perception and cognition meld.
Culture, desire, expectation, and learning are as important in determining
what we see as the sensation itself.
Larry Z
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html