Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/02/02

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] A new definition of inexpensive camera
Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2004 14:52:39 -0600
References: <>

> It's only expensive if you don't take any photos. I don't know what it
> you all to develop film, but for me it was about $20 for a roll of slide
> film and processing. And let's say $10 for a roll of B&W and processing
> I do it myself and consider my time to be free). So if I shoot:
> 2 rolls of B&W a week: $1040
> 1 roll of Chrome a week: $1040
> You've made back the price of your camera in six months.

You never make prints?  Those processing charges include 36 prints or a
contact sheet.   Make those prints with your Epson or HP printer and you
will quickly be adding up to nearly the same costs.

- --
To unsubscribe, see

In reply to: Message from Kyle Cassidy <> ([Leica] A new definition of inexpensive camera)