Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/02/02

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] digital in low light
From: Frank Dernie <Frank.Dernie@btinternet.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2004 20:39:37 +0000

Sorry I don't have a web site so you will have to take my word for the 
fact that in my case with a DSLR I get better results than I ever have 
on film in poor light. Digital P&S is much worse than film IME.
Frank


On Monday, February 2, 2004, at 08:06  pm, Steve Barbour wrote:

> animal wrote:
>
>>>>> Do any of you know of a link or publication   that explains at 
>>>>> what iso
>> the
>>>>> crossover is to 35mm,s film better performance.
>>>>> A  friend of mine who does pro sport showed me some low light 
>>>>> stuff made
>>>>> with his top Canon and it was allmost scary.
>>>
>>>
>>> let's see the photos...steve
>> I,ll ask him if I can do that.
>> simon
>
> Hi Simon, we have been hearing  how digital is better in low light 
> than film...I think we all would like to see the photos and the 
> objective testing that supports this conclusion...
>
> Steve
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
>

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

Replies: Reply from Steve Barbour <kididdoc@cox.net> (Re: [Leica] digital in low light)