Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/01/26

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: RE: [Leica] TriX at 800
From: "Jeffery Smith" <jls@runbox.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2004 16:44:04 -0600

Very true.

=======================================
I have heard that chromogenic films like XP2 is captured better by
scanners 
compared to silver based films.  Don't know how true this is.

Dan K.

At 04:50 AM 1/27/04, you wrote:
>What are you scanning with? My Minolta Scan Dual II chokes on Tri-X and

>spews out blotchy scans. Some weird reaction of the scanner res and the

>grain pattern in Tri-X. Everything else scans fine. Too bad Tri-X is my

>B&W film of choice!
>
>John Collier
>
>On Jan 26, 2004, at 12:36 PM, Adam Bridge wrote:
>
>>I did some playing with Tri-X at 800 and 1600.
>
>--
>To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html







    


- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html


- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

Replies: Reply from Steve Barbour <kididdoc@cox.net> (RE: [Leica] TriX 3200 at 1600/was TriX at 800)