Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/01/25
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Well, in that case, I'd still say it has nothing to do with the difference between cameras, since the lens is going to cover all of the sensors in question just fine - because they're identical physically. It's rare that there is absolutely no data reaching the sensor. And I have yet to detect a significant difference between the EOS D60 and D300. Though I haven't shot gemstones fluorescing under longwave UV and shortwave UV light yet. I haven't done any extremely long exposures with it either (15+ seconds). I guess now I'll have to do just that. Eric Welch Carlsbad, CA http://www.jphotog.com "To be is to do"--Socrates. "To do is to be"--Jean-Paul Sartre. "Do be do be do"--Frank Sinatra. - - By Kurt Vonnegut, Jr On Jan 25, 2004, at 7:53 PM, John Collier wrote: > It is not quite as simple as that. Some EOS cameras do not like > getting absolutely no data from the lens while other EOS cameras don't > mind at all and have software work arounds programmed in. It all > depends on the software feature set of the camera not the potential > capabilities of the sensor. - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html