Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/12/20
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Did I say we shouldn't have his information? No. I said that one should automatically besuspicious of anyone who HIDES their relationship with a company. There is a signal therelarge enough to be seen from a mile away that something isn't right. That's all. It has nothingto do directly with Erwin, who pretty much disloses the nature of h is relatinship with Leica. Anyone who thinks they can determine the validity of information without knowing the truesource of the information is naive. That's pretty much my argument. > We all should look at the publicity engine of any > name-brand company. Leica is no different from any > other companies in trying to market a product. They in > turn need someone like Puts to help get the word out. > However, as in any publications, the user themselves > have to determine whether such writings are worth > reading. I myself see Puts writings as a source of > information, but I wouldn't take it as Leica's Bible. > Some commonsense should be exercised. Personally, I > would rather have the information than none. - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html