Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/12/19

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: mobile phones (WAS: Film is not dead!)
From: Seth Rosner <sethrosner@direcway.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2003 14:20:23 -0500
References: <5.1.0.14.2.20031218173009.00a24e60@pop.2alpha.net> <3FE2A2D1.B3431BEF@chello.nl> <Pine.SOL.4.58-L.0312190853370.28060@hedvig.uio.no> <3FE330D3.8040507@osheaven.net> <3FE339E6.30809@hemenway.com>

Never owned a cell phone. And I'm a lawyer in active practice. Not a matter
of status. Always figured that no call, other than family emergency, was so
important that it could not wait until I next checked my voicemail - usually
not more than a couple of hours - and decided whether the incoming client
call was that emergent.

On the other hand, I've always made it a practice to return every client
call within not more than 24 hours, whether or not I thought it important.
Because it is always important to the client.

Seth           LaK 9

- ----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jim Hemenway" <Jim@hemenway.com>
To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Sent: Friday, December 19, 2003 12:48 PM
Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: mobile phones (WAS: Film is not dead!)


> Yep!  That's for sure why I haven't had one since around 1995!
>
> :-)
>
> Jim - http://www.hemenway.com
>
>
> sam wrote:
>
> > At my job, it is now a status symbol to NOT carry a cell phone. It has
> > come to mean that you are too important to be bothered with incessant
> > phone calls, and that there is an underling who will contact you in an
> > emergency.
> >
> > Sam S
> >
> >
> >
> > Daniel Ridings wrote:
> >
> >> I'm just like Nathan. In fact, I didn't even bother getting a land-line
> >> for my Oslo address. I can be in Africa, anywhere in Europe or even the
> >> places I go to in the US (Chicago, midwest area) and people can always
> >> call me on the same number. I would say that around 80 - 90% of all
> >> 15-year-olds in Sweden and probably Norway too have cell-phones. It's
> >> just
> >> the way they communicate now. When that many have one, there's no
status
> >> to it at all.
> >>
> >> Daniel
> >>
> >> On Fri, 19 Dec 2003, Nathan Wajsman wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>> Hi Peter,
> >>>
> >>> Usually I agree with your comments, but here I must say that at least
on
> >>> my side of the Atlantic, having a mobile phone ceased to be a status
> >>> symbol of any kind long ago. It is simply an indispensable part of
> >>> personal life for hundreds of millions of people. I don't even give
out
> >>> my fixed phone number anymore (home or office); most of the time when
> >>> people want to call me, they do not even know which country I am in
:-)
> >>>
> >>> Nathan
> >>>
> >>> Peter Klein wrote:
> >>>
> >>> In this respect "digital" joins things like cell phones, PDAs, fax
> >>>
> >>>> machines, PCs, Cabbage Patch dolls, hula hoops and oat bran as Stuff
> >>>> That
> >>>> All With-It People Gotta Have.
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> -- 
> >>> Nathan Wajsman
> >>> Almere, The Netherlands
> >>>
> >>> e-mail: n.wajsman@chello.nl
> >>> Mobile: +31 630 868 671
> >>>
> >>> Photo site: http://www.wajsmanphoto.com
> >>> -- 
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

Replies: Reply from Johnny Deadman <lists@johnbrownlow.com> (Re: [Leica] Re: mobile phones (WAS: Film is not dead!))
In reply to: Message from Peter Klein <pklein@2alpha.net> (Re: [Leica] Film is not dead!)
Message from Nathan Wajsman <n.wajsman@chello.nl> ([Leica] Re: mobile phones (WAS: Film is not dead!))
Message from Daniel Ridings <daniel.ridings@muspro.uio.no> (Re: [Leica] Re: mobile phones (WAS: Film is not dead!))
Message from sam <sam@osheaven.net> (Re: [Leica] Re: mobile phones (WAS: Film is not dead!))
Message from Jim Hemenway <Jim@hemenway.com> (Re: [Leica] Re: mobile phones (WAS: Film is not dead!))