Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/12/16

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Nathan's PAW 50: Waiting for Sinterklaas
From: Daniel Ridings <daniel.ridings@muspro.uio.no>
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2003 09:47:45 +0100 (MET)
References: <3FDD4CA5.8F1FB1BA@chello.nl> <187201c3c322$9471b490$0200a8c0@Desk> <3FDDEC35.3D741D7E@chello.nl>

> No, the 35 Summilux is not prone to vignetting. I guess it just happened
> on these shots. The light was in fact awful, a really depressing grey
> and dark day.

Boy, you'd never know it! The subtle colors are really attractive.

Daniel

>
> Nathan
>
> robertmeier@usjet.net wrote:
> >
> > Nathan,
> >
> > There is a fair amount of vignetting in these.  Is that normal with this
> > lens?
> >
> > Bob
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
>
> --
> Nathan Wajsman
> Almere, The Netherlands
>
> e-mail: n.wajsman@chello.nl
> Mobile: +31 630 868 671
>
> Photo site: http://www.wajsmanphoto.com
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
>
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

Replies: Reply from Nathan Wajsman <n.wajsman@chello.nl> (Re: [Leica] Nathan's PAW 50: Waiting for Sinterklaas)
In reply to: Message from Nathan Wajsman <n.wajsman@chello.nl> ([Leica] Nathan's PAW 50: Waiting for Sinterklaas)
Message from robertmeier@usjet.net (Re: [Leica] Nathan's PAW 50: Waiting for Sinterklaas)
Message from Nathan Wajsman <n.wajsman@chello.nl> (Re: [Leica] Nathan's PAW 50: Waiting for Sinterklaas)