Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/12/14
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]So much for all the bullsh*t about angle of incidence at the sensor then eh! If the last element is almost touching the sensor the angle of incidence will be very large unless, I suppose, the periphery of the lens element is not used but then why would it be there? Frank On Sunday, December 14, 2003, at 08:16 am, Eric Welch wrote: > A MUCH shorter focal length. And have you seen the diagram of the > internals of the Digilux2? The last element is almost touching the > sensor. With longer focal lengths, and a shutter in the way, you have > your answer. > > On Dec 13, 2003, at 9:56 AM, eric wrote: > >> The body and lens dimensions look so very M rangefinder. >> So again - Why can't they design a digital M body? >> I know it has been discussed at length about angles of incidence and >> sensors >> not up to the task - but what is so different about the digilux 2 that >> precludes designing a body to accept M lenses? > Eric > Carlsbad, CA > > 'Never ask a man what computer he uses. If it's a Mac, he'll tell you. > If it's not, why embarrass him?'" - Tom Clancey > > -- > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html > - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html