Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/12/11

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: RE: [Leica] The fine line between art and pornography
From: Adam Bridge <abridge@mac.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 10:55:17 -0800
 
On 2003-12-11 imagist@imagist.cnc.net (George Lottermoser) thoughtfully wrote: 

>They're not portraits of an intimate, inherently sexual act.
>They're portraits of individuals, exposed a moment after an inherently sexual 
>act.

Actually this is an example of male-centric art at its worst. It completely
leaves out the lesbian community and thus should be rejected and chastised in
the strongest possible terms.

AB
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
Replies: Reply from Leo W Wesson <lwwesson@pier1.com> (Re: [Leica] The fine line between art and pornography)