Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/12/09
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]You and Tim are seizing on one word. As I wrote earlier one can substitute feelings, message or any number of similar words... I simply gave you a definition of the lowest common denominator which you seem to want to parse into something unnecessarily more complex. Please show me those works to which you refer below. I'll bet the absence of emotion... is the emotion. Jim - http://www.hemenway.com Kit McChesney wrote: > Absolutely. In some works, the absence of emotion is the subject of the > work, or its raison d'etre. Goodness. Why don't we talk about some artists > who use the photographic image in their work and see what happens then? We > can then get into some down-and-dirty and really get our hands muddy. > > Kit > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us > [mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us] On Behalf Of Tim Atherton > Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 3:39 PM > To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us > Subject: RE: [Leica] On making Art > > > >>Art is the expression of an emotion through a technique. > > > I don't think the expression of emotion is an absolute requirment for art? > -- - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html