Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/11/03
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]What you are saying is that the method is more important than the message. I can't accept that. Fiction often informs more about reality than fact. That sounds like an untrue statement, but it is not because we filter all information through our perceptions. One's perceptions may very well not be in line with empirical reality. If a snap does not contain enough information to tell the story, perhaps the augmentation of fiction can. During my life, I have learned more about human nature from Shakespeare than from Freud. Sam S robertmeier@usjet.net wrote: > > One is the result of a photographer finding and capturing a moment of time > when all the elements of the picture have come together to form a > composition that has interest and life. The other is the result of a > director managing actors on a stage to produce a predetermined result. > Sometimes the results may look the same, but they are at opposite poles of > the universe in all other ways. > > Bob - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html