Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/11/02

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Stranded on an island with 2 Lenses
From: "Bill Harting" <wharting@adelphia.net>
Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2003 13:25:15 -0500
References: <BCEKKGNGDPMOIPMEJONBCEKLDAAA.phong@doan-ltd.com>

For me, probably the viewing lens and taking lens of my Rollei 3.5.

On the news this morning someone who lost everything in the California fires
was reflecting on what she would replace. What would you replace? Or would
you upgrade? Or simplify? And what's the point?

bill h


- ----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Phong" <phong@doan-ltd.com>
To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Sent: Saturday, November 01, 2003 11:22 PM
Subject: RE: [Leica] Stranded on an island with 2 Lenses


> My usual mode of operation:
> On the M:
> 1 lens kit: 50mm Summicron
> 2 lens kit: 35mm Summilux + 75mm Summilux
>    (used to be 90mm Apo Summicron, may be still be again someday)
> 3 lens kit: 24mm + 35mm + 75mm
>
> On the IIIg:
> 1 lens kit: 50mm Summicron
> 2 lens kit: 50mm Summicron + 90mm CV Apo Lanthar
>
>
> Answer: 35mm Summilux Asph + 75mm Summilux
>
> - Phong
>
>
>
> Doug Herr wrote:
> > I think we did this a few years back except it was one lens.  Two
> > lenses is
> > harder - I know the 400mm f/6.8 would be the first choice, but
> > the second is
> > a tough call.  60mm, 100mm, 280mm, or 560mm - hmmmmmm.....  I'd
> > make it the
> > 100 APO.
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
>

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from "Phong" <phong@doan-ltd.com> (RE: [Leica] Stranded on an island with 2 Lenses)