Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/10/04

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] OT: software, engineering, and microsoft
From: Clive Moss <chmphoto@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Sat, 04 Oct 2003 19:30:13 -0500
References: <1CA8E840-F6C2-11D7-A4E2-0003939F0384@kvdpsu.org> <r02000200-1030-939CA960F6C511D7AAD8003065F48752@[10.0.1.4]>

Greatness is not the issue. Netscape was giving browser software away free 
at no cost. So was Microsoft. The Microsoft product worked better, so 
people used it. No real users care about innovation. They care about 
usability. I have always had multiple browsers on my desktop. Microsoft may 
not have won based on innovation, but Netscape surely lost.

See http://reviews.cnet.com/4520-3514_7-5020639-1.html?legacy=cnet for a 
consumer oriented view of the battle. The key phrase is 
"Netscape--outdated, slow, and unstable--went down for the 
count."  Business practises notwithstanding, IE worked better.


At 06:50 PM 10/4/2003, Adam Bridge wrote:
>So Microsoft did nothing great - beyond applying their immense amount of cash
>into purchasing a solution and applying their own monopoly to its best
>advantage.


Best,
Clive
http://clive.moss.net 

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

Replies: Reply from Mike Durling <durling@cox.net> (Re: [Leica] OT: software, engineering, and microsoft)
In reply to: Message from Pete Su <psu@kvdpsu.org> ([Leica] OT: software, engineering, and microsoft)
Message from Adam Bridge <abridge@mac.com> (Re: [Leica] OT: software, engineering, and microsoft)