Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/09/30

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: RE: [Leica] Central now union bashing/praising
From: "Jim Shulman" <garcia@chesco.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 07:30:52 -0400

I have a similar story.  In the late 1970s the company that employed my
father ran a troublesome printing plant in downtown Philadelphia.  It
was grossly obsolete (about 60 years old), and the unionized workforce
had a contract with work rules so restrictive that the company could not
make money.  His company decided to sell the plant, but on the condition
that the new owner keep the unionized work force (I doubt we'd see that
kind of benevolence today!) Believe it or not, they found a buyer; there
would have to be some flexibility in the work rules as a condition of
sale.  The union balked.  There were tense meetings all over.  My father
had to have a private line installed in his office, and his boss
installed a remote starter for his car.  The union refused to budge, the
deal fell through, and the company shuttered the plant and dismantled
the equipment.  There was the expected shots on TV news with stunned
union reps, claiming that they never thought the company would really
close the plant.

The most famous example of this happened in Philadelphia in the middle
1930s.  Atwater Kent famously announced that if the CWA (Communications
Workers of America) organized his radio manufacturing company, he'd
close the plant.  The CWA had been successful locally with Philco and
RCA, so it was a natural move to move to Atwater Kent.  The union won
representation, and the Atwater Kent plant promptly closed after the
1936 line of radios was made.  

Jim Shulman
Bryn Mawr, PA


- -----Original Message-----
From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
[mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us] On Behalf Of Don Dory
Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2003 7:08 AM
To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
Subject: RE: [Leica] Central now union bashing/praising

Mark,
I have some inside knowledge of why owners move/shut down.  In the late
seventies the workers at the Bunn (coffee makers) plant in Springfield
Illinois got itchy to follow their peers at the Fiat/Allis plant down
the street into uniondom.  George Bunn paid above union scale, better
vacation/medical, no strange work hour requirements.  After the usual
negotiations where it was apparent the union was voted in on promises of
better wages/hours George Bunn closed the plant and moved production to
Iowa.
Oh, and the Fiat plant closed as well so all the happy union workers are
doing what in Springfield?

In this specific case it was workers trying to do better by themselves
but not aware of the larger forces at play. In this case, management
found a better business climate.  The new plant in a small farm
community maintains the same deal that existed in Springfield for the
workers and management has workers that are more reliable in terms of
absences for whatever reason.

George Bunn had experience in some of his other business's with unions
and had no problem with contracts, he did/does have problems with being
unable to eliminate workers who show up drunk, don't come to work a lot,
harass other employees and other activities that don't make a harmonious
work place for all especially the work force.

Don
dorysrus@mindspring.com

- -----Original Message-----
From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
[mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us] On Behalf Of Mark
Rabiner
Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2003 1:11 AM
To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
Subject: Re: [Leica] Central Camera in Chicgao

Yes when the workers get antsy you might as well quit if they're not
going to trust your kind benevolence.
If these sweet old store owners were so sweet they'd give there workers
a contract.
Is it more a shame these people felt so strongly about being in a union
or more a shame these people felt so strongly that ludicrously their
workers should only be represented by them their owners.

I really think the thrill of magnanimous benevolence goes only so far. 
What does it take to make it crumble? A worker demanding his rights to
some power.
In the climate of those times any worker would be ashamed to be working
without a contract and without a  union and thank god for that and them.
That's all we need is to go back to the humanitarian ideals of the
owners who get hurt so deeply when their employees betray them by
wanting a contract.
Me i free lance but don't work without a contract. And I'm glad i have
the power to insist on that.
My grandfather i get benevolence from the people who hire me can skip
it.
My job is to do what i put down I'm going to do and their job is to pay
me.
Preferably in cold unmarked unsequenced cash. No wait.. skip that part.

Why did those guys close down their businesses? Just exactly why?
A kind of sad ego?
Peer group pressure from the other "owners"? That's entirely possible.
I'll err on the side of the workers. There are more of them then owners.
Mark Rabiner

Portland, Oregon USA
http://www.rabinergroup.com
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html


- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html