Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/09/29
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]><Snip> > > (Then again, this probably wouldn't work for Kodak. > > They'd forget they had a > > monopoly and discontinue the film even if they had a > > monopoly on it...) > > > > Er, isn't that broadly the history of Kodak? How many > new formats have they invented over the years in an > attempt to tie customers in to their products, only to > abandon them later? 620, 828, 127, 110, 126, Disk and > probably a load of others I've forgotten. Once others > have adopted the format, Kodak have tried a new one. > Microsoft have behaved rather well in comparison - at > least there's a degree of backwards compatability... > ;) > > Nick I don't think Kodak is smart enough to think like that. Not evil enough. Rochester remember is where they are. Not Redmond. Not an evil place. Mark Rabiner Portland, Oregon USA http://www.rabinergroup.com - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html