Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/09/19

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Re:Digital M
From: Rei Shinozuka <shino@panix.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2003 10:25:38 -0400
References: <173.1fb2dedc.2c9b19cf@aol.com>

my covetous nature when it comes to "accessories" would probably
overcome my natural antipathy to the digitarians at the gate.  
if nothing else, it would be a cool way for me to check focus and 
lenses.

- -rei

On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 10:23:11AM -0400, LRZeitlin@aol.com wrote:
> 
> In a message dated 9/18/03 1:43:37 AM, Phong writes:
> 
> << Try these, if you can't navigate around.  [He signed
> 
> his name Gregoire, not Greg]
> 
> 
> http://users.skynet.be/fa420324/pages/overview.htm
> 
> http://users.skynet.be/fa420324/pages/flapback.htm
> 
> http://users.skynet.be/fa420324/pages/botpart.htm
> 
> http://users.skynet.be/fa420324/pages/internalbotpart.htm
> 
> http://users.skynet.be/fa420324/pages/menu.htm
> 
>  >>
> 
> Gregoire has a nice conceptual idea for an M back/baseplate for the Leica M. 
> Don't knock it. It's better than anything Leica has done, or at least 
> publicised. As far as the web site goes, using Explorer 5 on my Mac, I was unable to 
> advance between succesive pages and had to sequentially load the URLs given by 
> Phong. The small type was also hard to read., particularly in the option chart 
> on the last page. It would be better to redo the type in a simple black 
> textface if the site is revised.
> 
> If made one of these, I would probably buy it. Hear that Leica? Why not 
> simply do a web survey of Leica owners and test the strength of the potential 
> market?
> 
> Larry Z
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

- -- 
Rei Shinozuka shino@panix.com
Ridgewood, New Jersey

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from LRZeitlin@aol.com ([Leica] Re:Digital M)