Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/09/15

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Vulcanite patching help needed - M4 - thanks
From: Mike Durling <durling@cox.net>
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2003 20:58:31 -0400
References: <5.2.1.1.2.20030913170845.037e2980@192.168.100.11> <000b01c37a59$0dbd65a0$87d86c18@gv.shawcable.net> <3F63D25A.6ADC47FB@rabinergroup.com> <003101c37a7b$3ccc64a0$d890fea9@ibmthinkpad> <Pine.SOL.4.56-L.0309150921590.13555@hedvig.uio.no> <00d301c37b6e$d3479a50$0100a8c0@Desktop>

One of my M4s also has chipping vulcanite.  I have successfully used a 
black, two-part, epoxy which fills the gaps and helps hold the remaining 
vulcanite in place.  As you have guessed it is an ongoing battle.  I 
think the glue has deteriorated, so any chips will spread.  I do have 
another of the same age that has no defects in the vulcanite, but I 
think that one had much less use than the one I have used for almost 30 
years.

I think the epoxy was called "Liquid Steel" or something like that.  It 
is supposed to have iron filings in it for strength, but of course that 
is superfluous. I think it would come off if I worked at it, but it 
looks pretty good.  You can tell if you get right up to it, but that 
doesn't matter on a user.  I have seen leicas that were repaired by one 
of the better known repairers, and I think mine looks comparable.

Mike D

Steven Blutter wrote:
> Hi guys & gals:
> Just picked up my 1st M4(!) after years of M3's & an M6 0.85 when it came
> out... delighted with the 4 - where I have been??  My 50mm purism is
> officially challenged.
> Ran through 9 rolls over the weekend feeling the exhuberance of a student!
> Will post a few when avail....
> 
> -There is a bit of vulcanite chipping:
> http://www.sblutter.com/Chipped_Vulcaite_Steven_Blutter.htm that I don't
> want to get out of control.
> 
> The patches I did on an M3 with melted black crayon actually still looks
> good after 5 - 6 years, albeit clearly amateur but easily removed.
> 
> -I bet you guys have an even better solution - any (at home) suggestions?
> Its strictly a user.
> 
> Thanks in advance,
> Steven Blutter
> PS: Anyone have an extra meter for the 4?
> 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
> 

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from "Richard F. Man" <richard@imagecraft.com> ([Leica] Nikkor 50/1.4 vs. Canon 50/1.2 vs. Summilux 50/1.4)
Message from Ted Grant <tedgrant@shaw.ca> (Re: [Leica] Nikkor 50/1.4 vs. Canon 50/1.2 vs. Summilux 50/1.4)
Message from Mark Rabiner <mark@rabinergroup.com> (Re: [Leica] Nikkor 50/1.4 vs. Canon 50/1.2 vs. Summilux 50/1.4)
Message from "John Evensta" <jevensta@plateautel.net> ([Leica] Another Summitar picture)
Message from Daniel Ridings <daniel.ridings@muspro.uio.no> (Re: [Leica] Another Summitar picture)
Message from "Steven Blutter" <steven2244@ameritech.net> ([Leica] Vulcanite patching help needed - M4 - thanks)