Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/09/10

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] E6@home [was: Rant: another screw up by New Lab...
From: Jim Hemenway <Jim@hemenway.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 14:18:56 -0400
References: <02CBDF73-E3B3-11D7-8D5E-0003938051BC@snet.net> <3F5F639B.6070407@ldp.com>

Get the Kodak single use 6 step, I had nothing but trouble with the 3(4) 
step.

Rolfe Tessem wrote:

> Roy Zartarian wrote:
> 
>> That's pretty much the process in a nutshell except that you have to 
>> pour and drain each step of the chemistry at the proper time, a task 
>> facilitated by the use of the correct Lift for the processor.  Other 
>> items you might consider acquiring are a good mercury thermometer (I 
>> got mine from Edmund Scientific) to verify solution temperatures,  
>> appropriately graduated measuring cylinders (same source) if you 
>> decide to mix small batches of chemistry from a 5 liter 6-step kit, 
>> and a tupperware or Rubbermaid container to hold the stabilizer or 
>> final rinse since that stuff shouldn't be used on plastic reels.
>>
>> I've been doing my own E-6 for about 4 years now with a CPE-2 and now 
>> go to a lab only if I'm really at a loss for time.
>>
>> Roy
> 
> 
> Roy,
> 
> Do you use the 3 step or the 6 step kit? If you've used both, is there 
> still any noticeable advantage to the 6 step version?
> 
> Rolfe
> 

- -- 

Jim - http://www.hemenway.com

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from Roy Zartarian <rzartarian@snet.net> (Re: [Leica] E6@home [was: Rant: another screw up by New Lab...)
Message from Rolfe Tessem <rolfe@ldp.com> (Re: [Leica] E6@home [was: Rant: another screw up by New Lab...)