Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/09/06
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]In a message dated 9/6/03 5:19:52 PM Pacific Daylight Time, msmall@infionline.net writes: > Marshall's > performance as Secretary of State and Secretary of Defense was similarly > flawed. Note that Eisenhower, his protege, refused to have him in ANY > capacity during his term of office. - ----------------- Marshall was aging and he served Democratic presidents; and Eisernhower had patronage bills to pay. So why would he appoint Marshall. I doubt whether Marshall would want to serve under a former subordinate. Marshall was a very proud character. br - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html