Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/08/28
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Wow! Someone has WAY too much time on their hands! (Which is not in any way to defend the Geographic if the photo was faked/doctored or is not what it is purported to be.) ;-) B. D. - -----Original Message----- From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us [mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us] On Behalf Of Dan C Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 8:12 AM To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us Subject: Re: [Leica] Photo scandal at National Geographic!!! Was it really a fake bird on the cover? I was only able to read the first part of the article at the link, but what I did read reminded me (perhaps very unfairly) of all those "scientific" arguements "proving" that the Apollo moon walks were faked. But like I said, I may be being completely unfair, since I didn't read the article!!! Did National Geographic respond to the allegations? Dan C. At 06:55 AM 28-08-03 -0500, Don R. wrote: >National Geographic is having its share of problems starting with Peter >(Baghdad) Arnett and then the fake bird gracing the cover. > >Does anyone know exactly who blew the whistle on the fake bird episode? > >> http://www.naturephoto.hu/home/index.html >> -- > - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html