Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/08/26
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
At 9:49 PM -0400 8/26/03, Afterswift@aol.com wrote:
>In a message dated 8/26/03 5:13:37 PM, rhc3vt@hotmail.com writes:
>
><< The Micro-NIKKOR-P 3.5/55mm, for one. Can you explain the effect of
>diffraction on a lens such as the 9cm Elmar? >>
>
>I have a Micro Nikkor 2.8 that does have an f32. I never noticed it because I
>never needed to use it. However, it is remarkable that both the Leitz 90 f4
>and the Micro Nikkor seemed to have overcome diffraction, even all those years
>ago. I certainly will hold onto those two lenses.
They have not overcome diffraction. It is very evident in both those lenses.
Mush all around.
- --
* Henning J. Wulff
/|\ Wulff Photography & Design
/###\ mailto:henningw@archiphoto.com
|[ ]| http://www.archiphoto.com
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html