Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/08/26

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: Re: Leica 90mm f/4.0 Elmar C prices
From: Jerry Lehrer <jerryleh@pacbell.net>
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2003 08:23:39 -0700
References: <5.1.1.6.0.20030824125536.00b61a60@mail.horizon.bc.ca> <5.1.1.6.0.20030824153018.01ad4cc0@mail.horizon.bc.ca> <3F497026.538B3386@pacbell.net> <023701c36b8a$723a7b40$b32bb2cd@dnai.com>

Roland

I hate to burst your bubble, but both Elmars are f4.0.

Jerry

Roland Smith wrote:

> I have used the 90mm collapsible Elmar with my M3 for general photography
> stopped down 2 or more f-stops.  My results have been very acceptable.  I
> like the lens because it fits in the case when collapsed.
>
> However, I prefer my 90mm Elmar because of the extra f-stop.
>
> Roland Smith
> Oakland, California
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jerry Lehrer" <jerryleh@pacbell.net>
> To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
> Sent: Sunday, August 24, 2003 7:10 PM
> Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: Re: Leica 90mm f/4.0 Elmar C prices
>
> > David
> >
> > The 90mm Elmarit was my preferred portrait lens until it was stolen.
> > But just today I found a MINT collapsible 90mm Elmar at an estate
> > sale, along with a few Leica goodies. I have no experience with that
> > lens, but it will have to do.
> >
> > Jerry
> >
> > David Young wrote:
> >
> > > Jerry said:
> > >
> > > >I have found that the Elmarit and Tele Elmarit are quite different in
> > > >their performance at f2.8, with the Elmarit winning. These of course,
> are
> > > >with the M lenses.  I know that you prefer the R, but I have no
> experience
> > > >with the R Elmarit.
> > >
> > > Me neither.  I had the Tele-Elmarit-M  (skinny or 2nd version on a CL)
> and
> > > found it *very* satisfactory - even wide open.  I have no experience
> with
> > > the 90 Elmarit-M, so I cannot draw any distinctions.
> > >
> > > My only comment was that Slobodan had said he felt the T-E was
> "unusable"
> > > at f2.8.  With this, I do not agree.  :)
> > >
> > > ----------
> > >
> > > David Young,     | égalité, liberté,
> > > Victoria, CANADA | fraternité et Beaujolais.
> > >
> > > Website at: www.horizon.bc.ca/~dnr
> > >
> > > --
> > > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
> >
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

Replies: Reply from "Roland Smith" <roland@dnai.com> (Re: [Leica] Re: Re: Leica 90mm f/4.0 Elmar C prices)
In reply to: Message from David Young <dnr@horizon.bc.ca> ([Leica] Re: Leica 90mm f/4.0 Elmar C prices)
Message from David Young <dnr@horizon.bc.ca> ([Leica] Re: Re: Leica 90mm f/4.0 Elmar C prices)
Message from Jerry Lehrer <jerryleh@pacbell.net> (Re: [Leica] Re: Re: Leica 90mm f/4.0 Elmar C prices)
Message from "Roland Smith" <roland@dnai.com> (Re: [Leica] Re: Re: Leica 90mm f/4.0 Elmar C prices)