Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/08/20
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Good rational points all.... In my more lucid moments I've considered them all. I really need to control the amount of stuff I carry around. I am so used to lugging a backpack full of Nikon gear that I feel unprepared without a bag-o-junk over my shoulder. Another problem is that here in Arizona, it's so hot that wearing a garment with sufficient pockets is not practical this time of year. Your point is well taken. I'll go the pocket route in the winter. What I was really hoping for was a recommendation for a particular version(s) of a 90mm f2.8 lens. Any suggestions would be helpful (even negative commentary... "stay away from the tele-elmacronlux.. it sucks"). thanks Jack McLain Tucson, AZ http://jackmclain-photography.dotcommunity.net - ----- Original Message ----- From: "Sonny Carter" <sonc@sonc.com> To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 11:29 AM Subject: Re: [Leica] More Leica decisions to make... god help me > Jack McLain asked plaintively: Any of this make sense? Have I gone over the > edge? > > Yes, it is easy to do. Regarding the f2.8 90mm, They are generally great > lenses, but some sample variations. I was lucky. Most of the time you need > a 90, that's all you need, and it will fit in your pocket. > > I agree about having the shutter speed dial work the same on both cameras, > if you have two cameras. You might be able to get away with one body; you > do know the Leica M has interchangeable lenses, huh? ;>D > > If you are thinking of the camera as a back-up instead of a second body for > another kind of film, then why not just keep the m6ttl? It is already > yours. > > I find I shoot more if my field kit is smaller. I usually go out with the > 35 mounted and the 90 in my pocket. I also have a CV 15 I carry along. > > When I have a camera bag, I'm always trying to decide what to use, and I'm > often afraid someone will snatch the bag or something out of it. Just > easier to keep the lenses in pockets. > > BTW, I had a 28 and a 35, and found them too close together, and so rarely > used the 28 as it was slower and heavier. More for you to worry about! > > Sonny > http://www.sonc.com > > > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Jack McLain" <jmclainaz@comcast.net> > To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> > Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 12:23 PM > Subject: [Leica] More Leica decisions to make... god help me > > > > After much angst and uncertainty I bit the bullet and bought a MP. Now my > > kit includes the MP, a M6TTL, 35 ASPH, CV 28 f1.9, 50 f2 Summicron, and > 90 > > f2 Summicron. > > > > All well and good, but I am now considering a couple of "enhancements". I > > find the 90 to be nice glass indeed; particularly well suited for sneaky > > candid portraiture, but it is a boat anchor and a pain in the ass to carry > > around when a slower (and smaller/lighter) lens would suit just fine. > > > > I'm thinking about getting a 90 f2.8 for general use (and keeping the 90 > f2 > > of course). I believe that there are four Leica 90's that have the 39mm > > filter size and the current Elmarit with 46mm filter size. > > > > I'm hoping for some real-life suggestions of which of these lenses would > be > > a best choice for a user lens (rarity is irrelevent to me as a deciding > > factor). Lens hood availability and affordable cost considerations and the > > fact that I am shooting B&W these days might be factors in the > recomendation > > game. Size/weight/image quality are my major considerations. > > > > The second - and far less acute - "enhancement" is to unload the M6TTL and > > get a M6 with the original shutterspeed dial to make transitioning between > > the "right' way to turn vs the "wrong" way to turn a no-brainer when using > > both the MP and M6 bodies at the same time... or....going in a completely > > different and emotionally driven direction, dumping the M6TTL and buying > an > > M4, or possibly a M3/2 just for the pleasure of being able to play with > nice > > toys while still having a back-up body for insurance. > > > > Any of this make sense? Have I gone over the edge? > > > > thanks (and sorry for the totally on topic content... I'll relay my > > experiences about attempting to retro-fit my old 50 f2 screw mount > Summitar > > onto my Nikon CoolPix 995 next post). > > > > cheers > > Jack McLain > > Tucson, AZ > > http://jackmclain-photography.dotcommunity.net > > > > > > -- > > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html > > -- > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html