Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/08/18

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Fiber optics? I don't think so...
From: Tina Manley <images@InfoAve.Net>
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2003 12:41:13 -0400
References: <r02000100-1026-3C35CFCCD10D11D7A444000393D465D8@[10.0.1.3]>

At 06:16 PM 8/17/2003 -0700, you wrote:

>The professional-grade camera will handle dropping, getting punted like a
>football, being stood on, rained on, dropped in muddy rivers, and recover
>well enough to keep making pictures.  The consumer-grade camera suffers
>horribly at this abuse.  Most consumers baby their cameras so the abuse
>tolerance is good enough.
>
>
>Doug Herr
>Birdman of Sacramento
>http://www.wildlightphoto.com

Well, I'm about to take my 10D to Guatemala and I hope not to drop it in a 
muddy river!  I keep my M's around for tricks like that.  The 10D seems to 
be a very sturdy, well-built box to hold my CF cards.  It has been rained 
on but I am treating it a little more gingerly than I would an M because of 
the electronics.  I would think any camera, professional or consumer, with 
as many electronics as the digital ones have, would have to be treated more 
carefully.  For one thing, when you change lenses, it has to be in a 
non-dusty place or you'll end up with dust all over your digital 
files.  But that's true of all of the digital cameras.

I decided on the 10D instead of the 1Ds because of the size.  That 1Ds is a 
monster of a camera.  Compare these sizes:
Canon 1Ds  55.9 ounces, 6.1 x 6.2 x 3.2
Canon 10D  30.9 ounces, 5.9 x 4.2 x 3
Leica R9     28 ounces, 6.25 x 4 x 2.5

When I thought about carrying around the 1Ds with a 24-70/2.8 lens attached 
(another 2.1 pounds!), my knees started to ache!

Tina


Tina Manley, ASMP
www.tinamanley.com


http://www.pdiphotos.com
http://www.workbookstock.com
http://www.newscom.com
http://www.americanphotojournalist.com


- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

Replies: Reply from "animal" <s.jessurun95@chello.nl> (Re: [Leica] Fiber optics? I don't think so...)
Reply from Daniel Ridings <daniel.ridings@muspro.uio.no> (Re: [Leica] Fiber optics? I don't think so...)
Reply from Tina Manley <images@InfoAve.Net> (Re: [Leica] Fiber optics? I don't think so...)
In reply to: Message from Adam Bridge <abridge@mac.com> (Re: [Leica] Fiber optics? I don't think so...)