Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/08/15

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] No digital comments?
From: Daniel Ridings <daniel.ridings@muspro.uio.no>
Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2003 22:30:56 +0200 (MEST)
References: <4260509.1060957780504.JavaMail.nobody@bigbird.psp.pas.earthlink.net> <3F3D2934.4F40AB27@noaa.gov>

Ok guys, be warned.

If I'm going to pick up a camera without the express intention of creating
pictures, it's going to be a Leica. Some are not comfortable with the way
Leicas work, ... they are about all I've used for 35 years.

But his week ... I'm going to post a digital PaW. So if you don't lika
them, don'ta look.

Daniel


On Fri, 15 Aug 2003, Barney Quinn wrote:

>
> Hi,
>
> I've been thinking about this, too. This is what I think is going on. Most
> of us, to one extent or the other, probably think of the LUG as our
> photographic family, or at least our virtual photographic family. I think
> that many of us really do think of the LUG, and use the LUG, as more than
> our Leica center of gravity. I think that is fine. Often I have the radio
> on in my office as I work. It happens that I didn't yesterday. The way I
> found out about the blackout was via a post to the LUG. I thought that
> those posts were a good and valuable thing, and I welcome them.
>
> You can like digital or you can hate digital. You can decide to use it
> today, never use it, or you can decide to wait and see. Any one of these
> alternatives is just fine. But, what is very hard to do these days is to
> avoid or ignore the question or digital. I tend to agree with BD. There is
> a revolution going on right before our eyes and each of us has to make some
> choices about how we are going to participate in it. I think that it is an
> important question which interests, concerns, and troubles people. Most of
> us tend to talk to our friends and family about issues which concern us. It
> doesn't surprise me at all that people want to share their concerns and
> thoughts on what is in some sense a non-Leica topic with what they consider
> to be their virtual photographic family. I would say that is a considerable
> strength, not a weakness.
>
> Barney
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Douglas Herr wrote:
>
> > bdcolen <bdcolen@earthlink.net> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > I was thinking again last night about the comments of those
> > > who suggest we should only post Leica images...And wondered
> > > if that meant that, were the late Robert Capa a member of
> > > this list, you would only want to see his Leica images, and
> > > would have no interest in the images he shot with Contaxes
> > > and Rolleis?
> >
> > They'd be most appropriate on a combat photography list.
> >
> > Doug Herr
> > Birdman of Sacramento
> > http://www.wildlightphoto.com
> > --
> > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
>
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from Douglas Herr <telyt@earthlink.net> (Re: [Leica] No digital comments?)
Message from "Barney Quinn" <Barney.Quinn@noaa.gov> (Re: [Leica] No digital comments?)