Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/08/13
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Henning Wulff wrote: > > At 2:45 PM -0700 8/13/03, Mark Rabiner wrote: > >Douglas Herr wrote: > >> > >> Mark Rabiner <mark@rabinergroup.com> wrote: > >> > >> > High speed Ektachrome was 125 I recall. > >> > >> I recall 160, not 125. > >> > >> Doug Herr > >> Birdman of Sacramento > >> http://www.wildlightphoto.com > >> -- > >> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html > > > >I think it moved from 125 to 160 in the early 70's. I can picture the > >pop photo cover… BLAZING SPEED!! > > > >but i see Ektachrome 125 of various flavours being sold RIGHT NOW! But > >not being called high speed i guess) > > > > > >Mark Rabiner > >Portland, Oregon USA > >http://www.rabinergroup.com > >-- > >To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html > > Mark, I used HS Ektachrome 160 in the 60's. 125 was the speed of the > tungsten stuff, I believe. > Oh i forgot the 60's! I was grounded that decade! :) I actually shot a roll of Kodachrome tungsten once who remembers that ASA The Sixty-four thousand dollar question.... I think it was 80 but it might have been 40. I'll stick at 40 the film was around before K64 was even invented! Mark Rabiner Portland, Oregon USA http://www.rabinergroup.com - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html