Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/08/13
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
At 4:58 PM -0400 8/13/03, Afterswift@aol.com wrote:
>In a message dated 8/13/03 12:40:14 PM, jerryleh@pacbell.net writes:
>
><< I do believe that Karen is objecting
>to the NON-LEICA content of the digital contributions. >>
>
>As everyone knows, I'm not a digital zealot. As they say, I can take it or
>leave it alone. When someone mentions digital in a way that intersects my
>experience, and I can make a contribution to the dialog, I'll say a
>few words about
>it. As I pointed out, brand now makes little difference in digital cameras.
>Leica is marketing a back for the R9. I have no idea who makes it
>for them. So,
>as someone pointed out, it's legitimate for us to peruse the subject from time
>to time. The prosumer compacts are alike under the magnesium, so what
>difference does it make which of them we discuss. I could slap a
>Leica red dot logo
>on my Oly 5050 and come up with the same results as tho I used a Digilux. The
>only difference is that the 5050 uses the remarkable xD cards.
The real difference is that the Digilux (Panasonic LC5 version) is
responsive, and the Oly is a slug. A _BIG_ difference.
>
>br
>--
>To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
- --
* Henning J. Wulff
/|\ Wulff Photography & Design
/###\ mailto:henningw@archiphoto.com
|[ ]| http://www.archiphoto.com
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html