Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/08/10

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Second Thoughts on a Leica Second Body
From: Nathan Wajsman <n.wajsman@chello.nl>
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2003 06:54:17 +0200
References: <1DC7CCC8-CB9E-11D7-9428-003065F2FE36@xsmail.com>

Mitch Alland wrote:

> For: Nathan Wajsman
>
> >  and I do not
> > feel that I have to compromise the way I take pictures in order to use
> > it. I
> > did feel that way when I owned a IIIf, which is why I got rid of it
> > after a
> > few months.
>
> For what reason? The IIIf body itself, with separate framing and
> range-fineder windows, or the LTM lenses?

Mainly the body and exactly the thing you described. I found that it was
clunky and slowed me down.

Nathan

- --
Nathan Wajsman
Almere, The Netherlands

e-mail: n.wajsman@chello.nl
Mobile: +31 630 868 671

Photo site: http://www.wajsmanphoto.com


- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from Mitch Alland <malland@xsmail.com> (Re: [Leica] Second Thoughts on a Leica Second Body)