Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/08/10

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Lag misunderstanding
From: frank theriault <knarf.theriault@sympatico.ca>
Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2003 09:02:07 -0400
References: <BB5ACC8B.2B761%mlquinn.mail@earthlink.net>

Of course it's ~not~ denial.  Any idiot knows that there's a delay from the time
that one presses the shutter release, to the time that the shutter deploys.

I'm simply saying that the numbers are meaningless ~to me~.  Milliseconds are so
small as to be abstract.  I know what a cameras lag time is by using it, and
feeling it.

But, if someone says that a certain camera has a lag time of 50 milliseconds,
that doesn't mean a thing.  More to the point, if someone says that another
camera has a lag time of 55 milliseconds, I'd submit that the difference in
those two times is so small as to be meaningless in the real world.

But do lag times exist?  Of course.  Do they mean something to some people?
Obviously, otherwise, we wouldn't have this thread.

cheers,
frank

Mike Quinn wrote:

> Of course it's denial.
>
> It's sad to see people so threatened by numbers that they deny the existence
> of the things that the numbers measure...
>
> Mike Quinn
>
> LRZeitlin wrote:
>
> > I don't know why you guys object to knowing that the camera doesn't take a
> > picture the instant you decide to press the shutter. Denial perhaps?
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

- --
"The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist
fears it is true." -J. Robert
Oppenheimer


- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

Replies: Reply from Mark Rabiner <mark@rabinergroup.com> (Re: [Leica] Lag misunderstanding)
In reply to: Message from Mike Quinn <mlquinn.mail@earthlink.net> (Re: [Leica] Lag misunderstanding)