Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/08/08
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]LRZeitlin@aol.com wrote: > You don't even have to use film. The flash will illuminate the > position of > the marble and you or your friend will be able to mark how far it has > dropped on > the meter stick. [...] > > This simple test is about as accurate as they come. > Again, accuracy is not the issue -- validity is. Like so much experimental psychology, for the purpose that you are trying to use these results, this experiment is simple, elegant, accurate, and almost totally irrelevant. Pretty much the only case where a photographer is facing this kind of task is trying to catch the very first motion of a swimmer diving off the platform, or a sprinter's first push out of the blocks. But even in *those* cases (reaction to stimuli without preceeding rhythmic or timing context) you're typically interested in action that takes place slightly later: the swimmer's hands breaking the water's surface, or the runner with one foot in the blocks, the other on the ground, and leg extended. So, again, it's about timing: stimuli -- beat -- shutter release. For the very vast majority of photography, adding a 200 ms human reaction time to whatever the camera's shutter lag may be is completely meaningless in any sense other than the mathematical one. M. - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html