Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/08/08
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]LRZeitlin@aol.com wrote: > My old experimental psychology textbooks give the simple reaction time > of most people as about 200 milliseconds. This is largely irrelevant. The way such experiments are conducted is by having someone wait for a stimulus, then respond when they detect it as quickly as they can. In the real world, and certainly for most things that photographers point a camera towards, rhythm and timing is much more of a factor than reaction time. Photographs catch the height of action by *anticipating* the rhythm of something and by *timing* their exposure to coincide with the photographically optimal moment. Read Ted's comment on horse jumping, for example. I don't know of any experiments, but I'm quite sure that top drummers are capable of keeping time much closer than 200 ms to the theoretically perfect beat -- which is not explained by such psychological experimental results because these ignore context. As so much laboratory-based psychological experimentation does. By the same token, your proposed experiment has very little to do with real world photography. A better example would be someone who is bouncing a basket ball in a steady rhythm. I'm willing to bet that with a little experience and knowing your camera gear (i.e., getting a feel for the shutter lag, thus being able to anticipate the release moment), most people would be able to catch the ball compressed on the ground in a pretty good number of shots on a 36 exposure roll. M. - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html