Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/08/08

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Turing test
From: "Jean-Michel Tomaschett" <jx@bluewin.ch>
Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2003 23:04:28 +0200
References: <20030808202519.87956.qmail@web11607.mail.yahoo.com>

TGIS!!!  in an hour ;-)

le philosophe; Nathan, it's next to Mère Catherine (Niederdorf)

Jean-Michel

- ----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Aquiles Almansi" <aalmansi@yahoo.com>
To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Sent: Friday, August 08, 2003 10:25 PM
Subject: RE: [Leica] Turing test


> That's too Aristotelic for me Daniel. Let me offer a
> "postmodern" alternative:
>
> To represent something (before a particular audience),
> one needs to find the "sign" that can be interpreted
> (by that particular audience, but not necessarily by
> everybody else)as that thing one wants to represent.
>
> TGIF!!! :-)
>
> Achilles (weekend "semiologist")
>
> --- Daniel Ridings <daniel.ridings@muspro.uio.no>
> wrote:
> > Oh boy, now we are getting philosophical :)
> >
> > In order to represent something, you have to
> > reproduce its essence. (TGIF)
> >
> > Daniel
> >
> >
> > On Fri, 8 Aug 2003, bdcolen wrote:
> >
> > > A photo can be  a faithful REPRESENTATION of
> > something without being a
> > > faithful REPRODUCTION of something. ;-)
> > >
> > > B. D.
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
> > > [mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us]
> > On Behalf Of
> > > LRZeitlin@aol.com
> > > Sent: Friday, August 08, 2003 2:31 PM
> > > To: leica-users-digest@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
> > > Subject: [Leica] Turing test
> > >
> > >
> > > Eric writes:
> > >
> > > <<What's all this nonsense and turing tests that
> > mean nothing? Any idiot
> > >
> > >
> > > can tell the difference between a photo of a
> > window and the window.
> > >
> > >
> > > And I know cats that DO react to the TV.>>
> > >
> > > Eric,
> > >
> > > That's just the point. If the photo were truly a
> > faithful representation
> > > of
> > > reality, you should not be able to tell the
> > difference. "Truth" has
> > > nothing to
> > > do with photographic fidelity.
> > >
> > > Your cats are smarter than mine.
> > >
> > > Larry Z
> > >
> > > --
> > > To unsubscribe, see
> > http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
> > >
> > > --
> > > To unsubscribe, see
> > http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
> > >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe, see
> http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
>
>
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software
> http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

Replies: Reply from "Geir Bugge-Olsen" <gbugge-o@frisurf.no> ([Leica] WTB Leica M)
In reply to: Message from Aquiles Almansi <aalmansi@yahoo.com> (RE: [Leica] Turing test)