Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/08/08
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I don't think that's true. In order to represent something you have to correctly encode it according to some accepted form of representational system. Thus if I call you 'honey bunny', I can represent you by saying 'honey bunny' (so long as whoever I am trying to represent you TO knows that 'honey bunny' should be interpreted as 'Daniel Ridings'. This is not the same as saying that 'honey bunny' is the essence of Daniel Ridings. On Friday, August 8, 2003, at 03:15 PM, Daniel Ridings wrote: > Oh boy, now we are getting philosophical :) > > In order to represent something, you have to reproduce its essence. > (TGIF) - -- John Brownlow http://www.pinkheadedbug.com http://www.unintended-consequences.com - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html