Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/08/08

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: RE: [Leica] Turing test
From: "bdcolen" <bdcolen@earthlink.net>
Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2003 14:42:05 -0400

A photo can be  a faithful REPRESENTATION of something without being a
faithful REPRODUCTION of something. ;-)

B. D.

- -----Original Message-----
From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
[mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us] On Behalf Of
LRZeitlin@aol.com
Sent: Friday, August 08, 2003 2:31 PM
To: leica-users-digest@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
Subject: [Leica] Turing test


Eric writes:

<<What's all this nonsense and turing tests that mean nothing? Any idiot


can tell the difference between a photo of a window and the window.


And I know cats that DO react to the TV.>>

Eric,

That's just the point. If the photo were truly a faithful representation
of 
reality, you should not be able to tell the difference. "Truth" has
nothing to 
do with photographic fidelity.

Your cats are smarter than mine.

Larry Z

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

Replies: Reply from Daniel Ridings <daniel.ridings@muspro.uio.no> (RE: [Leica] Turing test)