Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/07/31

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Off to Alaska, Digital characteristic curves
From: Bob Haight <rhaightjr@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2003 10:01:38 -0700 (PDT)

Regarding the D100 not doing well in high contrast
situations, isn't the lack of latitude a problem with
most digital cameras. I don't hear much about it but
it seems to be a problem as yet unsolved in the
digital realm.  Bob Haight                            
          --- Mark Davison <mark_e_davison@msn.com>
wrote:
> I'm off to Alaska for a cruise with family and
> mother-in-law. I've been 
> lurking on the list for the last month or so.
> 
> After much soul searching I am only taking my N*k*n
> film SLR. I put together 
> a kit with Leica M and  the SLR but decided it just
> wasn't worth carting all 
> that stuff around to photograph glaciers and eagles.
> I guess I was inspired 
> by the "less is more" discussions, even though it
> means leaving the beloved 
> M camera at home.
> 
> I decided against my D100 because it just doesn't do
> well in high contrast 
> situations, and I'm hoping there will be some good
> days with bright light.
> 
> Being a techie by nature, I plotted out the
> characteristic curve of my D100 
> (digital output vs. exposure measured in stops.) You
> get what looks like a 
> power curve, with a long long toe, rising up to an
> extinction point at about 
> 2.5 stops above metered exposure. There is no
> shoulder, and the slope of the 
> curve is alway increasing. The metered exposure
> gives an output of about 97, 
> which is below what you would expect (128). Without
> adjustment in Photoshop, 
> the images coming out of the camera have very dark
> shadows, muddy midtones, 
> and highlights with excessive contrast, just as the
> characteristic curve 
> would predict.
> 
> The practical result is that in high contrast
> situations you must carefully 
> meter for the highlights with the spot meter, or
> they will be mercilessly 
> clipped, leaving daubs of brilliant flat white in
> your picture, where there 
> used to be white shirts, glaciers, peoples foreheads
> etc. Exposing for the 
> highlights makes the midtones quite dark, and often
> pushes the shadows into 
> the dreaded basement of weird digital noise.
> 
> Have any of you plotted characteristic curves for
> the Digilux or LC5? Do 
> they show similar characteristics?
> 
> Mark Davison
> 
>
_________________________________________________________________
> Help STOP SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months
> FREE*  
> http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, see
http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html


__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software
http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html