Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/07/31

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] arggghhh... rant at Keeble & Shucat...
From: David Prakel <david@photopartners.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2003 09:09:16 +0100

On 30/7/03 10:09 pm, "Ted Grant" <owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
wrote:

> Do you suppose Gene Smith, Bob Capa or HCB knew all this stuff? Or gave a
> flying hoop about it? Not likely.
> 
> However, on a positive note. I thank many of you for presenting your
> knowledge of camera operating systems and many other aspects from the
> technical side of photography over the years, as in quiet times I found it
> quite fascinating. But during a heated shooting session it's mainly
> forgotten.

Ted

In a way I agree with you but...

I personally think Andreas Feininger had it right in defining a good
photograph as one where strong photographic technique and good composition
(he refused to call it art) come together.

Take technique first. If you learn and practice all this technical stuff you
go through the learning cycle: unconscious incompetence > conscious
incompetence > conscious competence > unconscious competence. So the true
master knows this stuff but doesn't - as you rightly say - think consciously
about it when shooting.

Composition. This has a similar progression. My own art teacher said it was
something that was difficult, if not impossible, to teach - it was absorbed
and grown through exercise. I was told: 'look at lots of images, arrange
lots of photos in your head and in your camera and eventually you get better
informed and better at composition.'

Sitting there thinking about f-stops and proportions is not going to get a
photograph taken let alone taken well. But all that should inform your
photography.

My two penn'orth

- -- 
Regards
David

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html