Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/07/23
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Come on now. Personal opinion is fine, but MUCH better. I would not claim that for any Leica lens over any other. Much means visible at all levels: you must be trying to stir up trouble. Troll I think is the word. Now please back up your claims. On Wednesday, Jul 23, 2003, at 14:46 Australia/Melbourne, mehrdad-((kiakki.net)) wrote: > I have this lens and I think it is much better than the leica tri-elmar > > --------------------------------------------------- > regards, mehrdad > > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us > [mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us] On Behalf Of Michael > Volow > Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 7:40 PM > To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us > Subject: [Leica] Konica Hexanon M 21-35mm > > > Has anyone seen, played with or tested this lens? I see it in B&H's > catalog > currently. Are there reviews comparing it with the Tri-Elmar? Thanks. > (I > looked through archives and past posts and saw only a little about it). > > -- > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html > > > -- > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html > > Alastair - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html