Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/07/21
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I bought my wife the 10D and she took to it like a fish to water, hasn't picked up either of her Canon 35mm SLRs since she got it. And I swear her pictures are better. They are certainly better than the alleged 'pro' who shot the portraits at my son's kindergarten and neglected to fill in the shadows with the sun overhead, so all the eyesockets came out black. Not only no highlights in the eyes... no eyes. I notice that all of her friends are now eyeing it jealously and complaining about the lag on their digital compacts. We just networked the 1280 in the basement so she can now load the pix onto her iBook and print wirelessly (spools out over the wireless network to a Mac in the basement). Very cool. If the printer isn't turned on the basement Mac just queues the pictures and waits. JB On Monday, July 21, 2003, at 02:19 PM, Jim Laurel wrote: > You've got to be kidding. On Canon EOS SLRs, everything falls to hand > exactly as you would expect. But then, maybe it's just a matter of > familiarity. I think Leica could learn a thing or two from Canon in > this > regard. > > Imagine a lightweight, titanium-bodied M7d, with rubberized contour > grips. > Now, if they can just figure out that 14mp sensor for it... ;-) > > -Jim > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Allen Graves" <ahgraves@prodigy.net> > To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> > Sent: Monday, July 21, 2003 5:04 AM > Subject: Re: [Leica] Further digital exploration > > >> I also tried the canon 10D this weekend. It's remarkably blocky and >> seemed to have all the ergonomic design of a brick- though it is much >> lighter. The shop owner said people read the reviews, come in to buy >> it, look very disappointed when they first handle it- but then buy it >> anyway.It does take fine pictures, but it just feels clumsy on first >> handling. >> >> Allen >> >> >> >>> On 7/20/03 Peter Klein wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> I also tried the Nikon D100 and the Canon 10D. When I first held >>>> the >>>> latter, all I could think of was "TANK!" Granted, the lens >>>> mounted on > the >>>> 10D was a monstrous, honking bazooka of a 35-70 f/2.8 (?), which I > think >>>> was heavier than the camera. But I couldn't help thinking that my >>>> whole >>>> was of doing photography was "small and light," and this stuff was > anything >>>> but. Even with a prime lens. I'm sure that eventually I could >>>> learn > the >>>> operation of these beasts, but there would be a lot to learn. >>>> >>> >>> The dimensions of a 10D are: >>> >>> 150 x 107 x 75 mm (5.9 x 4.2 x 3.0 in) >>> >>> it weighs 790g >>> >>> The dimensions of an M7 are: >>> >>> 138 x 79.5 x 38 mm >>> >>> it weights 610g (no batteries) >>> >>> The R8 (since I was looking stuff up) are: >>> >>> 158 x 101 x 62 (without motor drive) >>> >>> it weighs 890 g. >>> >>> They are very much of the same size. >>> >>> >>> These dimensions don't scream "tank" to me. But boy the lenses sure >>> do. >>> >>> Adam Bridge >>> -- >>> To unsubscribe, see >>> http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html >> >> -- >> To unsubscribe, see >> http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html > > -- > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html > > - -- John Brownlow http://www.pinkheadedbug.com http://www.unintended-consequences.com - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html