Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/07/21

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Further digital exploration
From: "Jim Laurel" <jplaurel@nwlink.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2003 11:19:19 -0700
References: <r02000000-1030-12377A8EBB4211D7A901003065F48752@[10.0.1.3]> <p06001a00bb4185e9d3e2@[10.0.1.42]>

You've got to be kidding.  On Canon EOS SLRs, everything falls to hand
exactly as you would expect.  But then, maybe it's just a matter of
familiarity.  I think Leica could learn a thing or two from Canon in this
regard.

Imagine a lightweight, titanium-bodied M7d, with rubberized contour grips.
Now, if they can just figure out that 14mp sensor for it...  ;-)

- -Jim

- ----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Allen Graves" <ahgraves@prodigy.net>
To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Sent: Monday, July 21, 2003 5:04 AM
Subject: Re: [Leica] Further digital exploration


> I also tried  the canon 10D this weekend. It's remarkably blocky and
> seemed to have all the ergonomic design of a brick- though it is much
> lighter. The shop owner said people read the reviews, come in to buy
> it, look very disappointed when they first handle it- but then buy it
> anyway.It does take fine pictures, but it just feels clumsy on first
> handling.
>
> Allen
>
>
>
> >On 7/20/03 Peter Klein  wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>I also tried the Nikon D100 and the Canon 10D.  When I first held the
> >>latter, all I could think of was  "TANK!"  Granted, the lens mounted on
the
> >>10D was a monstrous, honking bazooka of a 35-70 f/2.8 (?),  which I
think
> >>was heavier than the camera.  But I couldn't help thinking that my whole
> >>was of doing photography was "small and light," and this stuff was
anything
> >>but.  Even with a prime lens.  I'm sure that eventually I could learn
the
> >>operation of these beasts, but there would be a lot to learn.
> >>
> >
> >The dimensions of a 10D are:
> >
> >150 x 107 x 75 mm (5.9 x 4.2 x 3.0 in)
> >
> >it weighs 790g
> >
> >The dimensions of an M7 are:
> >
> >138 x 79.5 x 38 mm
> >
> >it weights 610g (no batteries)
> >
> >The R8 (since I was looking stuff up) are:
> >
> >158 x 101 x 62 (without motor drive)
> >
> >it weighs 890 g.
> >
> >They are very much of the same size.
> >
> >
> >These dimensions don't scream "tank" to me. But boy the lenses sure do.
> >
> >Adam Bridge
> >--
> >To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

Replies: Reply from Allen Graves <ahgraves@prodigy.net> (Re: [Leica] Further digital exploration)
Reply from Karen Nakamura <mail@gpsy.com> ([Leica] M6 Titanium or Titanized?)
In reply to: Message from Adam Bridge <abridge@mac.com> (Re: [Leica] Further digital exploration)
Message from Allen Graves <ahgraves@prodigy.net> (Re: [Leica] Further digital exploration)