Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/07/17
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]First off, Mitch, I would expect a question/post about drinking Scotch to draw a far greater response on the LUG than virtually anything having to do with photography....;-) Second, for the life of me I cannot understand why you would consider either Don or Martin's posts regarding the use of the 75 Summilux "unresponsive." Both those guys gave you good tips. They may not have been the tips you wanted - but both are good tips. B. D. - -----Original Message----- From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us [mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us] On Behalf Of Martin Howard Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 1:56 PM To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us Subject: Re: [Leica] Lagavulin and focussing Noctilux and 75 Summilux in low light Mitch Alland wrote: > I posted about learning to drink Lagavulin and got 15-20 responses, > and I posted about the problems of focussing the Noctilux and 75 > Summilux in low light and got 1 response which was jocular not > informative 1 uninformative response? Don Dory contributed this: http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/v25/msg02887.html And I wrote: http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/v25/msg02865.html Which one do you consider to be uninformative? M. - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html