Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/07/16

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: RE: [Leica] digital glass
From: "Saganich, Christopher/Medical Physics" <saganicc@MSKCC.ORG>
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2003 18:26:56 -0400

And I thought a QED journey would only take me to the Virgin Islands. 

Chris Saganich
- -----Original Message-----
From: abridge@mac.com [mailto:abridge@mac.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 4:54 PM
To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
Subject: RE: [Leica] digital glass

On 2003-07-16 saganicc@MSKCC.ORG (Saganich, Christopher/Medical Physics)
thoughtfully wrote: 

>As a physicist I would to add that until the middle of the 1800's, the
generally 
>accepted theory of light was the particle picture. In this viewpoint, advocated 
>by Newton, light was considered to be a stream of tiny particles. However, in 
>the late 1800's, the particle picture was replaced by the wave theory of light. 
>This was because certain phenomena associated with light, namely refraction, 
>diffraction and interference, could only be explained using the wave picture.  
>In the early 20th century, experiments revealed that there were some phenomena 
>associated with light that could only be explained by a particle picture. Thus, 
>light as it is now understood, has attributes of both particles and waves.
>
>Chris Saganich

Ah but remember your quantum electrodynamics: all the wave behavior of light is
entirely explainable through quantum theory, while some behavior of light,
indeed some of which photographers love the best (I'm thinking of partial
reflection) are not explainable at all by wave theory - only a journey into QED
will explain them.

Engineers (like I used to be) don't care as long one theory or the other solves
the problem! Grin.

There's a wonderful little book by, of all people, Richard Feynman, called "QED"
that does a very good job of explaining all of this. I remember he points out
that our eyes need only be an order of magnitude more sensative and we'd not be
debating it at all because we're that close to being able to image individual
photons. An amazing thing when you think about it.

I cannot, however, do the math. :)


Adam
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html



 
     =====================================================================
     
     Please note that this e-mail and any files transmitted with it may be 
     privileged, confidential, and protected from disclosure under 
     applicable law. If the reader of this message is not the intended 
     recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this 
     message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any 
     reading, dissemination, distribution, copying, or other use of this 
     communication or any of its attachments is strictly prohibited.  If 
     you have received this communication in error, please notify the 
     sender immediately by replying to this message and deleting this 
     message, any attachments, and all copies and backups from your 
     computer.


- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html