Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/06/29
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]on 06/29/03 8:30 PM, Jim McIntyre at mcintyre@ca.inter.net wrote: > The reason? All the scans for > film based images are sent to his pre-press studio for scanning. The colour > corrention is done there to the magazine's specs, and his production staff > don't have to worry about it as much.. Those images that come in via digital > have to be colour corrected, or at least examined to ensure consistency. Jim, The way we handle that is to tell photographers to send us their digital images as close to "untouched" as possible. Especially no sharpening whatsoever. But they shouldn't be color correcting much anyway. Any time an images has been corrected, it can screw up our ability to get the highest quality image as we correct for our presses. On the other hand, it depends on the quality of the original. Sometimes we have to rely on the photographer to get it in the ball park before sending it to us. And it seems to me he should have the same people color correcting the digital images as who color corrects the images from scanned film. That would guarantee color consistency and take the burden off his staff. Either way, there has to be some person who is makes the final decision on when color correction is done - where I work, that's me - usually after several generations of proofs. Preferably proofs made with the same system that creates the plates for the presses . I like to joke about my printer at work being a $1.5 million Heidelberg. It's cool having a printer that can do 15,000 pages an hour! (And no, I'm not talking about a beverage). Eric Welch Carlsbad, CA http://www.jphotog.com "The theory of a free press is that truth will emerge from free discussion, not that it will be presented perfectly and instantly in any one account." - -- Walter Lippmann - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html