Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/06/27
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I suppose that is a good quesiton. The only problem I see with that is the hinged door on the back on a M camera is different than that of a R camera and is presumably more difficult to remove and replace with the sort of apparatus that would be required. I don't know for sure though. I suppose it is just more feasible to do with a R body. Frank - -------Original Message------- From: bdcolen <bdcolen@earthlink.net> Sent: 06/27/03 10:05 AM To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us Subject: RE: Re: [Leica] R8/R9 Digital Back announced > > There is one thing I don't get in all this - If the rear lens element must be further from the digital sensor than it must be from the film plane of the Leica M, and if what we're talking about is creating the same sort of Digoflex for the M that Leica is creating for the R, why can't this Digoflex simply consist of a bottom and back unit similar to that being created for the R, with the sensor mounted at the correct distance from the lens rear element? - -----Original Message----- From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us [mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us] On Behalf Of Frank Farmer Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 11:58 AM To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us Subject: Re: Re: [Leica] R8/R9 Digital Back announced I think it goes something like this: Film can react to light coming from many different angles. That is why the rear elements of M lenses can be so close to the film plane. However, the current batch of digital sensor technology requires the light to hit the sensor at pretty much a 90 degree angle (or much closer to it than film requires). Because the shape of a M body puts the lens so close to the would-be digital sensor, the sensor is not able to capture the desired image because the light is hitting it at an obtuse angle whereas film is able to capture the image because it can deal with that circumstance. At least, that is how I understand it. Who knows whether sensor techonology will 'catch up' with film in that regard so that a sensor could be placed in a M type body. Maybe it will happen. Right now, it is impossible. Frank - -------Original Message------- From: Jim McIntyre <mcintyre@ca.inter.net> Sent: 06/26/03 09:12 PM To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us Subject: Re: [Leica] R8/R9 Digital Back announced > > Ok, I'd like some clarification. The consensus seems to be the M > lenses are not suited to fit a digital body because of physics, angle of incidence or whatever. Now I realize that some of this will be buried in the archive, but I'm lazy...I'd rather someone tell me again. ;-) If the M camera can mount an M lense, and focus on the film plane, then it seems logical that that same film plane can be a digital sensor. Am I in deep space on this? Kit, are you being coy or do you know something? - ----- Original Message ----- From: "Kit McChesney | acmefoto" <kitmc@acmefoto.com> To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us > > Not necessarily. --K > > At 1:58 PM -0400 6/26/03, Emanuel Lowi wrote: > >While the idea of an adapted M for digital is a no-go, what I'd like > >to see is a > >digital body with dimensions/size/weight very similar to an M with Leicavit, that can > >mount M lenses on the front. > > > >For me, the shape/size/weight of the M has as more to do with its virtues as a > >shooting tool than do the specifics of its shutter type, > >advance/rewind mechanism and > >(omigosh) focussing system. > > > >Emanuel Lowi > >Montreal > > Unfortunately, it's the lenses that are the main problem. > - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html > - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html > - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html