Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/06/27
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Hi, As was explained by Aaron, it's the angle of the light that is the problem. Film has no depth to it, it is planar...light can hit it, say, up to 45 degrees with minimal degradation. Digital sensors have depth (specifically well depth), and the sensor is buried in a little "tunnel". The get progressively cut-off in it's ability to get to the sensor based on an increase in angle off the perpendicular axis of the sensor plane. Austin > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us > [mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us]On Behalf Of Kit > McChesney | acmefoto > Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 12:29 AM > To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us > Subject: RE: [Leica] R8/R9 Digital Back announced > > > Maybe you'd better ask Austin about this. He seems to know more about what > is possible, and what isn't, in this realm. I'm only a merchant, not an > engineer. > > Kit > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us > [mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us]On Behalf Of Jim > McIntyre > Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 8:13 PM > To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us > Subject: Re: [Leica] R8/R9 Digital Back announced > > > Ok, I'd like some clarification. The consensus seems to be the M > lenses are > not suited to fit a digital body because of physics, angle of incidence or > whatever. > > Now I realize that some of this will be buried in the archive, but I'm > lazy...I'd rather someone tell me again. ;-) > > If the M camera can mount an M lense, and focus on the film plane, then it > seems logical that that same film plane can be a digital sensor. Am I in > deep space on this? > > Kit, are you being coy or do you know something? - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html