Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/06/26
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]It was the same 'standard' copy and paste response with questions about a digital M. I think they were able to anticipate certain of the questions :-) Steve - -----Original Message----- From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us [mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us] On Behalf Of SonC (Sonny Carter) Sent: 26 June 2003 18:32 To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us Subject: Re: [Leica] Digital Back - I like the first step! looks like they had boilerplate ready for that question: [25/Jun/2003:18:30:14] <Leica host 4> jira: Can you try to compare the (aimed) digital photo quality with current top 35mm films? Leica: With almost all applications the same image quality can be expected. Experience made by Kodak with their 6.8 痠 pixel architecture lets us expect an excellent image quality especially in conjunction with Leica lenses. 25/Jun/2003:18:51:37] <Leica host 3> luoyan: In terms of the image quality, could the quality of picture made by digital back would be as good as the picture made by film? thank you.Leica: With almost all applications the same image quality can be expected. Experience made by Kodak with their 6.8 痠 pixel architecture lets us expect an excellent image quality especially in conjunction with Leica lenses. - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html