Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/06/26
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]It was the same 'standard' copy and paste response with questions about a digital M. I think they were able to anticipate certain of the questions :-) Steve - -----Original Message----- From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us [mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us] On Behalf Of SonC (Sonny Carter) Sent: 26 June 2003 18:32 To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us Subject: Re: [Leica] Digital Back - I like the first step! looks like they had boilerplate ready for that question: [25/Jun/2003:18:30:14] <Leica host 4> jira: Can you try to compare the (aimed) digital photo quality with current top 35mm films? Leica: With almost all applications the same image quality can be expected. Experience made by Kodak with their 6.8 µm pixel architecture lets us expect an excellent image quality especially in conjunction with Leica lenses. 25/Jun/2003:18:51:37] <Leica host 3> luoyan: In terms of the image quality, could the quality of picture made by digital back would be as good as the picture made by film? thank you.Leica: With almost all applications the same image quality can be expected. Experience made by Kodak with their 6.8 µm pixel architecture lets us expect an excellent image quality especially in conjunction with Leica lenses. - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html